User talk:Woelle ffm
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:38, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:39, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
File:Praunheiemr Brücke.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Túrelio (talk) 21:40, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Praunheiemr Brücke alt.JPG[edit]
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Praunheiemr Brücke alt.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Eva K. is evil 17:11, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- Hallo,
ist noch im Bearbeitungstatus
[Ticket#2011011110006147]
Lieber Herr X,
jetzt habe ich die Kollegin doch schneller als gedacht erreicht. Zur Beantwortung Ihrer Fragen:
1. Sind Sie der alleinige Urheber des Bildes oder alleiniger Inhaber der vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechte an dem Bild? Der Fotograf des Bildes ist unbekannt. Als alleiniger Inhaber der vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechte gilt das Historische Museum Frankfurt
2. Wenn ja, sind Sie mit der oben beschriebenen Lizenzierung unter der "Creative Commons - Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 3.0 Deutschland"-Lizenz einverstanden? Ja, das Historische Museum ist damit einverstanden
3. Wie möchten Sie in der Bildbeschreibung als Urheber genannt werden? (Bsp.: Klarname, Benutzername, ...) historisches museum frankfurt
Ich hoffe, daß ich Ihnen damit jetzt weiterhelfen konnte und wünsche viel Erfolg für Ihren Beitrag!
Beste Grüße
Gabriela Betz ___________________________ Historisches Museum Frankfurt Dr. Gabriela Betz Saalgasse 19 60311 Frankfurt Tel. 069/21230596 gabriela.betz@stadt-frankfurt.de www.historisches-museum-frankfurt.de
--Woelle ffm (talk) 17:24, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- Und wo ist nun die Lizenz? Bitte trage sie nach. --Eva K. is evil 05:52, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Hallo Ich habe die TicketNumber=2011011110006147 eingetragen leider kommt dann ein OTRS Anmeldefeld.Kannst du Helfen?? PS.:Habe gerade Probleme mich anzumelden --Woelle ffm
- Bitte trage eine gültige Lizenz ein. Das hat nichts mehr mit dem OTRS-Ticket zu tun. --Eva K. is evil 10:56, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Hallo Ich habe die TicketNumber=2011011110006147 eingetragen leider kommt dann ein OTRS Anmeldefeld.Kannst du Helfen?? PS.:Habe gerade Probleme mich anzumelden --Woelle ffm
Tip: Categorizing images[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 11:29, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Altweilnau (Weilrod-Hessen).jpg was uncategorized on 23 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:29, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Pendelverkehr Berechnung.JPG was uncategorized on 29 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:22, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Tabelle Reibungswiderstand.JPG was uncategorized on 29 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:22, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Berechungsblatt Wasserförderung Lange Wegestrecke.JPG was uncategorized on 29 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:22, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Berechnung der Wegestrecke.jpg was uncategorized on 7 February 2011 CategorizationBot 14:56, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
File:19473096.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Emha (talk) 09:10, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Woelle ffm. You have new messages at Rotatebot's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 08:01, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 06:55, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 08:38, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Category:Firefighting in art[edit]
Hi, you wrote: "Hallo PeterWD, du hast einige Bilder mit einer neuen Category versehen. Diese sind leider nicht immer richtig. Bitte immer kontrollieren, ob dies sinnvoll ist". (English via Google: PeterWD Hello, you have a few pictures with a new Category provided. Unfortunately, these are not always correct. Please check whether this is useful).
- The subcategory "... in art" covers all images that are not produced purely via a camera. You can further diffuse the images by adding further sub-cats such as paintings, drawings, sculptures, diagrams, cartoons, sketches, graphs, etc. For examples, see Category:Aviation in art. I hope this answers your query. PeterWD (talk) 22:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
hallo woelle, wie ich bereits im dezember hier: [3] dazu geschrieben habe, bin ich entschieden gegen diese "falschkategorisierung" von bildern und möchte deswegen gerne dazu deswegen weitere meinungen hören bzw. weiter diskutieren! --dontworry (talk) 07:56, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- Die Frage zur Kategorie stellt mich aufgrund, wo die Straße sich befindet. Meiner Meinung nach und Aufgrund der Liste ist die Straße im Riederwald.--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 10:32, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- die überprüfung ist denkbar einfach: 1. stadtplan ffm aufrufen [4]; 2. nach auswahl der passenden grösse (klein, mittel oder gross für die bei deinem bildschirm passende auflösung) und "start", erscheint ein zusätzöiches java-fenster des stadtplans. 3. in diesem fenster in der kopfzeile mit dem curser/maus-zeiger auf "karten" klicken und dort auf "verwaltungsgrenzen 1:20000 klicken. danach erscheinen die stadtteilgrenzen mit stadtteilnamen zusätzlich im stadtplan. damit kannst du alle eintragungen entsprechend einfach überprüfen. --dontworry (talk) 11:13, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- Überzeugt, Bild wieder in Seckbach und auch in der de:Liste_der_Stolpersteine_in_Frankfurt_am_Main--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 11:56, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- mersie scherrie! ;-) --dontworry (talk) 12:15, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- Überzeugt, Bild wieder in Seckbach und auch in der de:Liste_der_Stolpersteine_in_Frankfurt_am_Main--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 11:56, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- die überprüfung ist denkbar einfach: 1. stadtplan ffm aufrufen [4]; 2. nach auswahl der passenden grösse (klein, mittel oder gross für die bei deinem bildschirm passende auflösung) und "start", erscheint ein zusätzöiches java-fenster des stadtplans. 3. in diesem fenster in der kopfzeile mit dem curser/maus-zeiger auf "karten" klicken und dort auf "verwaltungsgrenzen 1:20000 klicken. danach erscheinen die stadtteilgrenzen mit stadtteilnamen zusätzlich im stadtplan. damit kannst du alle eintragungen entsprechend einfach überprüfen. --dontworry (talk) 11:13, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Stolpersteine1 Vorlage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rolf Acker (talk) 20:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Tauglgries has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Herzi Pinki (talk) 15:04, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Pohler Estrichbrocken.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Didym (talk) 20:16, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Wilhelm Caspari[edit]
Hallo Woelle!
Du hast bei dem Bild File:Wilhelm Caspari.jpg als Quelle angegeben "http://www.frankfurt.de/Stolpersteine". Ich kann das Bild dort nicht finden, auch nicht über die Suchfunktion oder die Seite "Stolpersteine in Sachsenhausen" (http://www.frankfurt.de/sixcms/detail.php?id=1907322&_ffmpar[_id_inhalt]=9406086). Bin ich zu blöd, oder haben die da wieder was rausgenommen, was mal da war? Kannst Du mir weiterhelfen?
gruß, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 06:16, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hallo Frank C. Müller, das / die Fotos ist/sind über das Infoblatt 17.10.2014 raus gegangen. Ich bin schon am forschen, wo die Bildrechte liegen.
- Diese Sind aus dem Buch:
- Renate Heuer, Siegbert Wolf (Hg.), Die Juden der Frankfurter Universität. Unter Mitarbeit von Holger Kiehnel und Barbara Seib. Mit einem Vorwort von Notker Hammerstein. Campus Verlag Frankfurt/New York 1997.
- Wie du auch merkst, ist die HP Stolpersteine auf der Stadt Ffm mit Bildern nicht sehr aktuell.
Danke für die Antwort! Ich komm mal in der nächsten Zeit zum Eurem Stammtisch nach Ffm; vielleicht treffen wir uns dann ja da mal. Wär nett!
gruß, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk)
09:42, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Hallo, ich vergas zu ergänzen, das Frau Renate Heuer verstorben ist. (PS.: über sie gibt es einen Artikel in Wiki) Uni-ffm link HP von ihr PSS: ich kann nur Donnerstags --Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 12:19, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
File:Der Anspruch an die Ladungssicherung1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 08:29, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Hohe Birga uebersicht.jpg[edit]
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Hohe Birga uebersicht.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:42, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hallo Woelle ffm, wenn du ein Bild von WP:de nach Commons verschieben möchtest, dann gibt es folgende Möglichkeiten:
- füge beim Bild auf WP:de (!) die Vorlage
{{Commonsfähig}}
hinzu. Innerhalb von ein paar Tagen wird das dann auch getan, sei etwas geduldig. (Es sei denn, das Bild ist eben nicht commonsfähig.) - Verwende https://tools.wmflabs.org/commonshelper um ein Bild nach Commons zu verschieben.
- füge beim Bild auf WP:de (!) die Vorlage
- Bilder sollten nicht einfach nach Commons kopiert werden, es ist dann auch dafür zu sorgen, dass sie in WP:de gelöscht werden. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 10:32, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
- Huhu, ich dachte, bei gleichen Namen kommt eine automatische Weiterleitung nach Commons--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 10:40, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
- huhu? Es war nicht mal gleicher Name. Aber nein, Dateien müssen ordnungsgemäß verschoben werden. In dem speziellen Fall hat es auf WP:de noch die Datei de:File:Hohe Birga.jpg gegeben (inzwischen von mir gelöscht), die die gleichnamige Datei auf commons File:Hohe Birga.jpg verdeckt hat. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:01, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
- Huhu, ich dachte, bei gleichen Namen kommt eine automatische Weiterleitung nach Commons--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 10:40, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Deine Kategorien zu Götzens[edit]
Hallo Woelle ffm, du hast einige neue Kategorien zu den Denkmälern in Götzens angelegt. Bitte beachte in Hinkunft
- die korrekte Schreibung von Namen, lieber dreimal kontrollieren, als nacharbeiten müssen (Einthöfen -> Einethöfe)
- COM:OVERCAT: Wenn du Bilder in einer neuen Kategorie zusammenfasst, dann wandern die Kategorien, die das Objekt beschreiben, von den einzelnen Bildern zur neuen Kategorie und müssen bei den einzelnen Bildern entfernt werden.
- Die Kategorien müssen kategorisiert werden, aber dazu musst du verstehen, was die Kategorienamen bezeichnen. Category:Churches in Bezirk Innsbruck-Land enthält nur Kirchen im Bezirk Innsbruck Land, keine Kruzifixe oder Notburgabrunnen.
lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:10, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Fh. Praunheim, DMS-Grabstätte Hubel, frl.-56.jpg[edit]
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Fh. Praunheim, DMS-Grabstätte Hubel, frl.-56.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 19:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Varrentrappstr 47.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Bodhisattwa (talk) 10:56, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Varrentrappstr 47-49.jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Varrentrappstr 47-49.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Varrentrappstr 47-49.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Didym (talk) 17:53, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Julius-Heymann-Straße 12[edit]
Ich bin verwirrt. Du hattest die Bilder der Stolpersteine vor Julius-Heymann-Straße 12 hochgeladen (findet sich jetzt in category:Julius-Heymann-Straße 12). Im Nachgang habe ich festgestellt, dass wir schon Category:Julius-Heyman-Straße 12 (Frankfurt) haben. Der richtige Name ist auch de:Julius Heyman. Jetzt hätte ich einfach auf den richtigen Namen verschoben: Aber die Häuser Julius-Heyman-Straße 12 und Julius-Heymann-Straße 12 sind total andere. Bei meinem Bild ist die Hausnummer zu erkennen: Da bin ich eigentlich optimistisch, das richtige Objekt erwischt zu haben.--Karsten11 (talk) 11:10, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hallo, hochgeladen ja, aber nicht photographiert. Mit Kategorien, insbesondere auf commons, stehe ich nach viel vor auf Kriegsfuß. Du machst das schon.--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 12:43, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Karsten11: müssen dann nicht die Adressen in die Kat's Stolpersteine in Frankfurt am Main-(Ortsteil) rein?--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 16:20, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nein, ich habe Deine Änderung auf Category:Wolfsgangstraße 41 (Frankfurt) revetiert. Wolfsgangstraße 41 ist kein Stolperstein sondern ein Haus in einer Straße. File:Stolperstein wolfsgangstr 41 reiss hugo.JPG ist ein Stolperstein und gehört zu Wolfsgangstraße 41. Meine Eingangsfrage lautet umformuliert: Ich habe den Verdacht, dass File:Julius-heymann-str 12.jpg nicht das Haus Julius-Heyman-Straße 12 sondern ein anderes zeigt. Vieleicht kann man den Fotografen fragen. Ansonsten werde ich das einmal überprüfen, wenn ich in der Gegend bin.--Karsten11 (talk) 17:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- aus dem Stehgreif weiss ich leider nicht, wer der Fotograph ist und ich bin leider nicht bei der nächsten Stolpersteinsitzung dabei. schau dir bitte mal die Kat's Category:Stolpersteine in Frankfurt am Main-Nordend an, ob dies so stimmt.--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 17:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nein, ich habe Deine Änderung auf Category:Wolfsgangstraße 41 (Frankfurt) revetiert. Wolfsgangstraße 41 ist kein Stolperstein sondern ein Haus in einer Straße. File:Stolperstein wolfsgangstr 41 reiss hugo.JPG ist ein Stolperstein und gehört zu Wolfsgangstraße 41. Meine Eingangsfrage lautet umformuliert: Ich habe den Verdacht, dass File:Julius-heymann-str 12.jpg nicht das Haus Julius-Heyman-Straße 12 sondern ein anderes zeigt. Vieleicht kann man den Fotografen fragen. Ansonsten werde ich das einmal überprüfen, wenn ich in der Gegend bin.--Karsten11 (talk) 17:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Karsten11: müssen dann nicht die Adressen in die Kat's Stolpersteine in Frankfurt am Main-(Ortsteil) rein?--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 16:20, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Bild des Physikalischen Vereins mit Kriegsschäden[edit]
Hi, erst mit Verspätung schaffe ich es zu antworten. Ich hab eins, ist aber nicht in guter Qualität und es ist wohl schlicht auch noch nicht gemeinfrei und daher nicht für Wikipedia geeignet. Liebe Grüße, --David Liuzzo (talk) 18:13, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Hallo Woelle, es sind das Kraftwerk und er Paselstollen eh als ganzes in der Tal-Kat daher wäre es redundant --K@rl (talk) 16:15, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Karl Gruber: Hallo, danke für´s auseinander ziehen. Mir ging es hauptsächlich darum, das im dazugehörigem Artikel zur Zeit nicht zu viele Bilder reinkommen.--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 16:26, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Hallo Woelle, ist das korrekt, dass du die takt. Zeichen wie sie in A verwendet werden da einordenen, dass ja wieder eine Untergruppe des german firefighting ist?. --K@rl (talk) 20:31, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Karl Gruber: Servus! Stimmt das funktioniert so nicht ..... Hier muss noch mal eine Trennung zwischen österreichischen und deutschen Zeichen rein. Allerdings sind die österreichischen Zeichen alte deutschen Zeichen (vor 2006). Kannst du das bitte passend schieben?--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 20:43, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Dann mache es anders, und schreibe in der Beschreibung dazu dass sie bis 2006 auch in D galten. dann passts. --K@rl (talk) 21:00, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Karl Gruber: dann zu deiner Info, mit der Zusammenlegung der FWDV 3-5 und der FWDV13 zu der neuen FWDV3 ist dies passiert. --Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 21:03, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- okay, liegt an dir, wie genau, dass du es ergänzt. --mkg K@rl (talk) 21:32, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Karl Gruber: dann zu deiner Info, mit der Zusammenlegung der FWDV 3-5 und der FWDV13 zu der neuen FWDV3 ist dies passiert. --Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 21:03, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Dann mache es anders, und schreibe in der Beschreibung dazu dass sie bis 2006 auch in D galten. dann passts. --K@rl (talk) 21:00, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Karl Gruber: Servus! Stimmt das funktioniert so nicht ..... Hier muss noch mal eine Trennung zwischen österreichischen und deutschen Zeichen rein. Allerdings sind die österreichischen Zeichen alte deutschen Zeichen (vor 2006). Kannst du das bitte passend schieben?--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 20:43, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Steine am jüdischen Friedhof[edit]
Hi Uwe, das ist imho doppelt falsch. Zum einen gehört (wenn überhaupt) die ganze Category:Memorial stones in sign frieze (Battonnstraße, Frankfurt am Main) in die Stolperstein-Kat (dann brauchen wir das nicht bei jedem zu machen) vor allem aber sind das ja keine (Demming-)Stolpersteine. (Category:Sign frieze (Battonnstraße, Frankfurt am Main) ist in der Kat Holocaust memorials in Frankfurt am Main)--Karsten11 (talk) 14:09, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Karsten @Karsten11: , über die Kategorie habe ich mir keine Gedanken gemacht. vielleicht kann man dies über eine Ebenlösung abfangen. ich denke an Gedenksteine in Frankfurt mit den Kategorie Stolpersteine in Frankfurt und Memorial stones in sign frieze (Battonnstraße, Frankfurt am Main) --Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 14:40, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
About Talk:Atlas[edit]
Hello,
The talk page Talk:Atlas contains many talks about the gallery page Atlas. Why are you redirecting this talk page to w:Benutzer_Diskussion:Woelle_ffm, in this edit and this edit?
Regards --NicoScribe (talk) 07:42, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- Deutsch!!!--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 07:43, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- [5] + [6] → warum? --NicoScribe (talk) 07:46, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- Deutsch!!!--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 07:43, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
alles nur auf einer seite--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 22:16, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Weiterleitung von Diskussionsseiten auf ein anderes Projekt ist hier unzulässig. Es funktioniert nicht und hat keinen Sinn. Bitte nicht wieder einsetzen. --A.Savin 13:21, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- Abgesehen davon sind auch innerhalb von Commons Weiterleitungen zwischen zwei Namensräumen ein Grund zur Schnellöschung. Eine Galerieseite auf eine einzige Benutzerdiskussion zu verlinken ist außerdem unsinnig, weil die Galerieseite nicht Dir allein gehört. Und last but not least ist [[:w: die Abkürzung für die englische Wikipedia, d. h. die Zielseite, die Du angeben hattest, existiert dort gar nicht. De728631 (talk) 13:33, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
File:Total Commander.gif has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
MPK100 (talk) 00:01, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Stolpersteine renaming[edit]
Hi, can you use crit. 2 or 3 to request renaming if it is a wrong name. Crit. 4 is to make files look the same. Thnx. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 14:17, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- (Google translate): Hallo, kannst du krit verwenden? 2 oder 3, um die Umbenennung anzufordern, wenn es sich um einen falschen Namen handelt. Krit. 4 ist, Dateien gleich aussehen zu lassen. Danke. Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 14:17, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, i do ist so--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 14:46, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Kleine Frage[edit]
Hallo, Woelle ffm! Ich hab gerade ein paar Fotos ergänzt zur Auferstehungskirche Praunheim (Innenansicht). Das war schon lange mal fällig, dieser Artikel entspricht sowieso nicht den üblichen Standard für Kirchenartikel. Nun hatte ich Dein Fotos vom Jugendklub etwas retuschiert (weil das ja so früher nicht aussah, das war kurz vor dem Abriss und sieht ziemlich verwahrlost aus) und auch mehr Kontrast reingebracht und wollte diese neue Version hochladen. Ich dachte, dass das geht, weil ich das woanders schonmal gemacht hab. Hat aber nicht funktioniert. Hmmm, hoffentlich bist du nicht sauer - weiß Du, warum das nicht funktioniert? Liebe Grüße,--Nadi2018 (talk) 18:50, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hallo User:Nadi2018, leider weiss ich dies auch nicht. du kannst aber unter einen neuen Namen hochladen und aus quelle mich angeben und bearbeitung vorgenommen hinschreiben--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 21:57, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Danke, ich versuchs mal: das ist hier bei commons ziemlich kompliziert. Danke und Grüße,--Nadi2018 (talk) 22:00, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- So, ich habs nochmal versucht und jetzt erscheint meine neue Version und die alte trotzdem wieder an erster Stelle, das muss aber irgendwie am Sysem liegen, versteh ich nicht. Tststs...Wenn es nicht klappt, ist es ja nicht schlimm, dann entschuldige bitte.--Nadi2018 (talk) 22:16, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hallo Nadi2018, Ich sehe aktuelle deine zweite Besserung und im Artikel genauso.--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 22:27, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Da ist was schiefgelaufen. Das foto in der Mitte ist das aufgebesserte, das hat das System hier nicht angezeigt und dann hab ich das nochmal hochgeladen und jetzt ist wieder das nicht bearbeitete drin, egal - hab keine Zeit dafür, lassen wirs halt dabei - ist nur schade, weil das ja früher nicht in dem verwahrlosten Zustand war..., Gruß--Nadi2018 (talk) 22:36, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hallo Nadi2018, Ich sehe aktuelle deine zweite Besserung und im Artikel genauso.--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 22:27, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
What's your problem with splitting this overwritten file? There is no reason to remove the split request. They are both entirely valid images. Ww2censor (talk) 09:44, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Das Bild ist für Insta geeignet, aber nicht für Wiki.--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 10:10, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Hallo Uwe, was ist das? Kulturdenkmäler sind in Category:Cultural heritage monuments at Hauptfriedhof Frankfurt, Gewann XII etc. sortiert. Diese Liste ist a) in deutsch statt in englisch und b) ohne (von mir erkennbare) Systematik. Oberkats sind Category:Grave markers, Category:Memorial stones, Category:Frankfurt am Main und Category:Hauptfriedhof (Frankfurt am Main). Grave markers passt nicht auf den Inhalt, weil auch Brunnen, Gräber oder Mausoläen enthalten sind. Category:Memorial stones ist Oberkat zu den Grabsteinen und damit überflüssig, Category:Frankfurt am Main ist Oberkat zu Category:Hauptfriedhof (Frankfurt am Main) und damit überflüssig. Was ist die Idee dahinter?--Karsten11 (talk) 15:20, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hallo Karsten11, die Bilder sind jetzt in der Cat, wo die Bilder in der Liste zu finden sind. Teilweise sind diese in zwei Listen zu finden, da sie in beiden Listen zu finden sind. Hintergrund ist der, das zur Zeit Bilder hochgeladen wurden, wo ich nicht wusste, in welche Kat diese rein, also habe ich die Kat entsprechende des Names der Liste angelegt .... Hoffe alles beantwortet zu haben--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 15:40, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Das Ziel verstehe ich jetzt. Dann wäre das richtige Vorgehen, eine Category:Cultural heritage monuments at Hauptfriedhof Frankfurt, Gewann I–XV zu schaffen, in die die Einzelkategorien Category:Cultural heritage monuments at Hauptfriedhof Frankfurt, Gewann I bis Category:Cultural heritage monuments at Hauptfriedhof Frankfurt, Gewann XV rein kommen.--Karsten11 (talk) 15:49, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hallo, kann man die einfach verschieben, ohne irgendetwas auf Wiki zu machen, dort habe ich meist nur Commonscat eingetragen...--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 15:55, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Jetzt verstehe ich auch die Kategoriebezeichnung! Wenn Du nur Commonscat einträgst, nimmt die Software automatisch den Artikelnamen als Commonskategorienamen. Wenn (wie hier) ein abweichender Kategoriename auf Commons besteht, muss dieser angegeben werden, hier dann also {{Commonscat|Cultural heritage monuments at Hauptfriedhof Frankfurt, Gewann I–XV}}. Vorgehensvorschlag: Wir legen diese Kat so wie von mir vorgeschlagen an, passen Commonscat in den Listenartikeln an und verwandeln Category:Liste der Kulturdenkmäler auf dem Hauptfriedhof Frankfurt (Gewann I–XV) in eine Kategorie-Weiterleitung.--Karsten11 (talk) 16:20, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hallo Karsten11, kannst du gerne machen. Ich habe die Liste der Kulturdenkmäler auf dem Hauptfriedhof Frankfurt (Gewann I–XV), Liste der Kulturdenkmäler auf dem Hauptfriedhof Frankfurt (Gewann G–N), Liste der Kulturdenkmäler auf dem Hauptfriedhof Frankfurt (Gewann E–F), Liste der Kulturdenkmäler auf dem Hauptfriedhof Frankfurt (Gewann C–D), Liste der Kulturdenkmäler auf dem Hauptfriedhof Frankfurt (Gewann A–B) und Liste der Gräber bekannter Persönlichkeiten auf dem Hauptfriedhof Frankfurt angelegt.--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 16:43, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Jetzt verstehe ich auch die Kategoriebezeichnung! Wenn Du nur Commonscat einträgst, nimmt die Software automatisch den Artikelnamen als Commonskategorienamen. Wenn (wie hier) ein abweichender Kategoriename auf Commons besteht, muss dieser angegeben werden, hier dann also {{Commonscat|Cultural heritage monuments at Hauptfriedhof Frankfurt, Gewann I–XV}}. Vorgehensvorschlag: Wir legen diese Kat so wie von mir vorgeschlagen an, passen Commonscat in den Listenartikeln an und verwandeln Category:Liste der Kulturdenkmäler auf dem Hauptfriedhof Frankfurt (Gewann I–XV) in eine Kategorie-Weiterleitung.--Karsten11 (talk) 16:20, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hallo, kann man die einfach verschieben, ohne irgendetwas auf Wiki zu machen, dort habe ich meist nur Commonscat eingetragen...--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 15:55, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Das Ziel verstehe ich jetzt. Dann wäre das richtige Vorgehen, eine Category:Cultural heritage monuments at Hauptfriedhof Frankfurt, Gewann I–XV zu schaffen, in die die Einzelkategorien Category:Cultural heritage monuments at Hauptfriedhof Frankfurt, Gewann I bis Category:Cultural heritage monuments at Hauptfriedhof Frankfurt, Gewann XV rein kommen.--Karsten11 (talk) 15:49, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Dreikoenigstr 35.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Dreikoenigstr 35.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Dreikoenigstr 35.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Stolpersteinlage Niedenau 53.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine niedenau 53.jpg
- File:Stolersteinlage Oberlindau 83.jpg
- File:Mainzer landstr 36.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:09, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Stolpersteine eschersheimer landstr 69.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Stolpersteine eschersheimer landstr 69.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Stolpersteine eschersheimer landstr 69.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Gebäude Parkstr 15.jpg
- File:Stolperst savignystr 12-14 moser alfred.jpg
- File:Savignystr 12-14.jpg
- File:Stolperst savignystr 12-14 moser ruth.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine savignystr 12-14.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Geb Bettinastr 23.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Geb Bettinastr 23.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Geb Bettinastr 23.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:07, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Stolperst rubensstr 26 tuch charlotte.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Stolperst rubensstr 26 tuch charlotte.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Stolperst rubensstr 26 tuch charlotte.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Stolperst oppenheimer str 44 kramer beate.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine rubensstr 26.jpg
- File:Stolperst oppenheimer str 44 kramer ferdinand.jpg
- File:Geb Oppenheimer str 44.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine oppenheimer str 44.jpg
- File:Geb Rubensstr 26.jpg
- File:Stolperst rubensstr 26 sass georg.jpg
- File:Stolperst rubensstr 26 sass laura.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:13, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Geb Stegstr 36.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Geb Stegstr 36.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Geb Stegstr 36.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Stolperst stegstr 36 neumann walter.jpg
- File:Stolperst thorwaldsenstr 20 meister elisabeth.jpg
- File:Geb Thorwaldsenstr 20.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Stolperst uhlandstr 38 karpf meilechhermann.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Stolperst uhlandstr 38 karpf meilechhermann.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Stolperst uhlandstr 38 karpf meilechhermann.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Stolperst uhlandstr 38 karpf moses l.jpg
- File:Stolperst uhlandstr 38 bergmann gustel ester.jpg
- File:Stolperst uhlandstr 38 karpf zysie aron.jpg
- File:Stolperst uhlandstr 38 bergmann leopold.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine uhlandstr 38 bergmann.jpg
- File:Stolperst uhlandstr 38 bergmann israel.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine uhlandstr 38 karpf.jpg
- File:Stolperst uhlandstr 38 bergmann nora.jpg
- File:Stolperst uhlandstr 38 karpf viktor avigdor.jpg
- File:Stolperst uhlandstr 38 karpf chaim.jpg
- File:Geb Uhlandstr 38.jpg
- File:Stolperst uhlandstr 38 karpf faiga.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:17, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Stolpersteine obermainstr 11.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Stolpersteine obermainstr 11.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Stolpersteine obermainstr 11.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Geb Obermainstr 11.jpg
- File:Stolperst sonnemannstr 79 oestreicher ludwig.jpg
- File:Stolperst sonnemannstr 79 oestreicher ilse ruth.jpg
- File:Geb Am tiergarten 52.jpg
- File:Stolperst am tiergarten 52 wormser berta.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Stolperst am tiergarten 52 wormser berta.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Stolperst am tiergarten 52 wormser berta.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Stolperst am tiergarten 52 wormser berta.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:05, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Stolperst elkenbachstr 6 merkel dora.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Stolperst elkenbachstr 6 merkel dora.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Stolperst elkenbachstr 6 merkel dora.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Stolperst elkenbachstr 6 merkel ferdinand.jpg
- File:Geb elkenbachstr 6.jpg
- File:Stolperst elkenbachstr 6 stein hedwig.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine elkenbachstr 6.jpg
- File:Stolperst elkenbachstr 6 stein ludwig.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:10, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Stolperst fichtestr 3 moritz ludwig.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Stolperst fichtestr 3 moritz ludwig.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Stolperst fichtestr 3 moritz ludwig.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Stolperst fichtestr 3 moritz hannah.jpg
- File:Geb Fichtestr 3.jpg
- File:Stolperst fichtestr 3 moritz wally.jpg
- File:Stolperst fichtestr 3 moritz rosy.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine fichtestr 3.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:10, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Geb Seumestr 7.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Geb Seumestr 7.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Geb Seumestr 7.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Geb hammanstr 3.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine seumestr 7.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine hammanstr 3.jpg
- File:Stolperst hammanstr 3 wronker johanna.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine rotlintstr 41.jpg
- File:Geb Rotlintstr 41.jpg
- File:Stolperst rotlintstr 41 zimmerer willy.jpg
- File:Stolperst seumestr 7 stobiecka ruchel.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:13, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Stolperst musikantenweg 34 kelsen david.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Stolperst musikantenweg 34 kelsen david.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Stolperst musikantenweg 34 kelsen david.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Moerfelder landstr 362.jpg
- File:Stolperstein Stelzer Emil.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine moerfelder landstr 362.jpg
- File:Stolperstein Stelzer Else.jpg
- File:Stolperst moerfelder landstr 362 bluethental dr paul.jpg
- File:Stolperst musikantenweg 34 kelsen heinrich.jpg
- File:Kelsterbacher str 8.jpg
- File:Stolperst musikantenweg 34 kelsen fanny.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine kelsterbacher str 8.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine musikantenweg 34.jpg
- File:Stolperst musikantenweg 34 kelsen paul.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:16, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Stolpersteine neue Kraeme 31.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Stolpersteine neue Kraeme 31.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Stolpersteine neue Kraeme 31.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:08, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Stolpersteine heiligkreuzgasse 13.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Stolpersteine heiligkreuzgasse 13.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Stolpersteine heiligkreuzgasse 13.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:05, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Stolpersteine rechneigrabenstr 18-20.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Stolpersteine rechneigrabenstr 18-20.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Stolpersteine rechneigrabenstr 18-20.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:06, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Stolperst praechterstr 21 schmitt johann.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Stolperst praechterstr 21 schmitt johann.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Stolperst praechterstr 21 schmitt johann.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Geb Schuetzenstr 2.jpg
- File:Stolperst praechterstr 21 schmitt elfriede.jpg
- File:Stolperst praechterstr 21 schmitt bertha.jpg
- File:Geb Praechterstr 21.jpg
- File:Stolperst praechterstr 21 schmitt werner.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine praechterstr 21.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:11, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Lindenring 1.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Lindenring 1.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Lindenring 1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Geb Hinter den ulmen 22.jpg
- File:Huegelstr 144.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine karl-albert-str 33.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine karl-albert-str 25.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:10, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Gebaeude Elbestrasse 15.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Gebaeude Elbestrasse 15.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Gebaeude Elbestrasse 15.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Stolpersteine im eichwaeldchen 32.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Stolpersteine im eichwaeldchen 32.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Stolpersteine im eichwaeldchen 32.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Stolperst obermainstr 11 hirsch walter.jpg
- File:Stolperst im eichwaeldchen 32 welzenheimer peter anton.jpg
- File:Stolperst obermainstr 11 hirsch helene.jpg
- File:Sonnemannstrasse 79 2.jpg
- File:Sonnemannstrasse 79 1.jpg
- File:Heiligkreuzgasse 13.jpg
- File:Im eichwaeldchen 32.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:12, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Stolperst savignystr 12-14 moser alfred.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Stolperst savignystr 12-14 moser alfred.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Stolperst savignystr 12-14 moser alfred.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Stolperst oppenheimer str 44 kramer beate.jpg
- File:Geb Stegstr 36.jpg
- File:Stolperst uhlandstr 38 bergmann leopold.jpg
- File:Stolperst uhlandstr 38 karpf faiga.jpg
- File:Savignystr 12-14.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine rubensstr 26.jpg
- File:Stolperst stegstr 36 neumann walter.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine uhlandstr 38 bergmann.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine obermainstr 11.jpg
- File:Geb Bettinastr 23.jpg
- File:Stolperst savignystr 12-14 moser ruth.jpg
- File:Stolperst oppenheimer str 44 kramer ferdinand.jpg
- File:Stolperst thorwaldsenstr 20 meister elisabeth.jpg
- File:Stolperst uhlandstr 38 bergmann israel.jpg
- File:Stolpersteinlage Niedenau 53.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine savignystr 12-14.jpg
- File:Geb Oppenheimer str 44.jpg
- File:Geb Thorwaldsenstr 20.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine uhlandstr 38 karpf.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:24, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Stolpersteine schumannstr 69.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Stolpersteine schumannstr 69.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Stolpersteine schumannstr 69.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Stolperst uhlandstr 38 bergmann gustel ester.jpg
- File:Stolperst sonnemannstr 79 oestreicher ilse ruth.jpg
- File:Stolperst rubensstr 26 tuch charlotte.jpg
- File:Stolperst uhlandstr 38 karpf zysie aron.jpg
- File:Geb Am tiergarten 52.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine niedenau 53.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine oppenheimer str 44.jpg
- File:Stolperst uhlandstr 38 bergmann nora.jpg
- File:Stolersteinlage Oberlindau 83.jpg
- File:Geb Rubensstr 26.jpg
- File:Stolperst uhlandstr 38 karpf viktor avigdor.jpg
- File:Mainzer landstr 36.jpg
- File:Stolperst rubensstr 26 sass georg.jpg
- File:Stolperst uhlandstr 38 karpf chaim.jpg
- File:Gebäude Parkstr 15.jpg
- File:Stolperst rubensstr 26 sass laura.jpg
- File:Geb Uhlandstr 38.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine eschersheimer landstr 69.jpg
- File:Stolperst uhlandstr 38 karpf meilechhermann.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:24, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:ADAC Luftrettung Christoph 65 (D-HUTH).jpeg[edit]
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:ADAC Luftrettung Christoph 65 (D-HUTH).jpeg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
IN (talk) 06:00, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- @IN: I'm afraid it seems you did not properly check the file. There were two information templates with the source being in the second one. The "original text" there also makes it clear that this is a work by the original uploader. De728631 (talk) 00:34, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't notice.--IN (talk) 04:47, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Altstadt mit OSM hinweis.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Altstadt mit OSM hinweis.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Altstadt mit OSM hinweis.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Altstadt mit OSM hinweis.jpg[edit]
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Altstadt mit OSM hinweis.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
JuTa 22:44, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Hallo, diese von dir erstellte Kategorie ist leer. Wird sie noch benötigt? -- Discostu (talk) 09:30, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hallo @Discostu: , ich hoffe, das hier User sind, die freier Bilder vom Brand haben; Hilft Bilderwunsch?--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 10:14, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ich würde davon ausgehen, dass User, die den Brand fotografiert haben, entsprechende Bilder inzwischen auch schon hochgeladen hätten. Auf jeden Fall denke ich, dass man die Kategorie erst anlegen sollte, wenn Bilder da sind, nicht umgekehrt. -- Discostu (talk) 10:45, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ich habe erst mal ein Bildwunsch gesetzt. Ich hatte damals gedacht, dass ich einfach an Bilder komme--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 15:56, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ich würde davon ausgehen, dass User, die den Brand fotografiert haben, entsprechende Bilder inzwischen auch schon hochgeladen hätten. Auf jeden Fall denke ich, dass man die Kategorie erst anlegen sollte, wenn Bilder da sind, nicht umgekehrt. -- Discostu (talk) 10:45, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Stolperstein Goldblatt Selma Carl-Theodor-Reiffensteinplatz 5.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Stolperstein Goldblatt Selma Carl-Theodor-Reiffensteinplatz 5.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Stolperstein Goldblatt Selma Carl-Theodor-Reiffensteinplatz 5.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Stolperstein Goldblatt Sally Carl-Theodor-Reiffensteinplatz 5.jpg
- File:Stolperstein Goldblatt Keile Klara Carl-Theodor-Reiffensteinplatz 5.jpg
- File:Stolperstein Goldblatt Abraham Carl-Theodor-Reiffensteinplatz 5.jpg
- File:Stolperstein Goldblatt Helene Carl-Theodor-Reiffensteinplatz 5.jpg
- File:Stolperst lange str 28 rothschild eduard.jpg
- File:Stolperstein Zeil 85 Wronker Hermann AG.jpg
- File:Stolperst lange str 28 rothschild clotilde.jpg
- File:Stolperstein Zeil 85 Wronker Ida.jpg
- File:Stolperstein Goldblatt Pepi Carl-Theodor-Reiffensteinplatz 5.jpg
- File:Stolperstein Zeil 85 Wronker Hermann.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:15, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Stolperst albusstr 24 girgulski maria.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Stolperst albusstr 24 girgulski maria.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Stolperst albusstr 24 girgulski maria.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Stolperst seilerstr 33 levy auguste.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine Klingerstrasse 25 Elison Fritz.jpg
- File:Stolperst boerneplatz 1 heinrich martha.jpg
- File:Stolperst albusstr 24 eichberg berta.jpg
- File:Stolperst seilerstr 33 levy max.jpg
- File:Stolperst boerneplatz 1 heinrich arthur.jpg
- File:Stolperst boerneplatz 1 heinrich max.jpg
- File:Stolperst boerneplatz 1 heinrich philipp.jpg
- File:Stolperst mainstr 8 dillenburger sally.jpg
- File:Stolperst seilerstr 33 levy judith.jpg
- File:Stolperst boerneplatz 1 heinrich edith.jpg
- File:Stolperst boerneplatz 1 heinrich elisabeth.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine mainstr 8.jpg
- File:Stolperst mainstr 16 bukspan moshe.jpg
- File:Stolperst boerneplatz 1 heinrich emilie.jpg
- File:Stolperst boerneplatz 1 heinrich zilli.jpg
- File:Stolperst mainstr 8 dillenburger ernst.jpg
- File:Stolperst mainstr 16 bukspan ruth.jpg
- File:Stolperst boerneplatz 1 heinrich flora.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:24, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Stolperst albusstr 24 girgulski max.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Stolperst albusstr 24 girgulski max.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Stolperst albusstr 24 girgulski max.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Stolperst albusstr 24 girgulski salomon.jpg
- File:Stolperst mainstr 16 bukspan toni.jpg
- File:Stolperst albusstr 24 hagel josef.jpg
- File:Stolperst mainstr 16 bukspan edith.jpg
- File:Stolperst mainstr 8 dillenburger klara.jpg
- File:Stolpersteine Klingerstrasse 25 Elison Emma.jpg
- File:Stolperst mainstr 8 dillenburger marianne.jpg
- File:Stolperst boerneplatz 1 heinrich jonas albi.jpg
- File:Stolperst boerneplatz 1 heinrich josef.jpg
- File:Stolperst boerneplatz 1 heinrich julius.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:15, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Pirates Head Logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Wdwd (talk) 10:51, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
File tagging File:Pirates Main Logo.png[edit]
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Pirates Main Logo.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pirates Main Logo.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Wdwd (talk) 14:06, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:RTW Stabu.jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:RTW Stabu.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:RTW Stabu.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Wdwd (talk) 10:04, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Ehrenabzeichen Feuerwehr (Deutschland) 6 ohne Namen.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Ehrenabzeichen Feuerwehr (Deutschland) 6 ohne Namen.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Ehrenabzeichen Feuerwehr (Deutschland) 6 ohne Namen.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:05, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Sabine Lackner.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Sabine Lackner.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Sabine Lackner.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:15, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo, die Freigabe steht unter Beschreibung -> Genehmigung und beim Hochladen wurde die Lizenzabfrage nicht eingeblendet ....--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 08:23, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Benutzer Woelle ffm TGL Farbe.JPG[edit]
Copyright status: File:Benutzer Woelle ffm TGL Farbe.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Benutzer Woelle ffm TGL Farbe.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:08, 15 November 2023 (UTC)