User talk:Milliped

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to the Commons, Milliped!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)


Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Milliped!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

--EugeneZelenko 16:05, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Milliped!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:05, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token da6810fa2af981338b61b203c31af71b[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 0ee908ee41e69a003381f1a530f9740f[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:40, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Could it be this was on the 27th, not the 29th? In that case, it would be the same demo mentioned here and here... For the 29th I can't find any match. -- Buzz-tardis (talk) 04:56, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're right; the photo's match and it may well be that the time/date on the old Fuji Finepix was off. 29 is the name of the folder on my PC, but that could well be the date I emptied the SD card. Milliped (talk) 12:56, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Could you rename/re-upload, as described in Commons:File renaming? thanks. -- Buzz-tardis (talk) 13:02, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Castres-MazametAirportOct2005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Léna (talk) 12:25, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Milliped,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 23:57, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 19:04, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:BadhoevedorpAerialViewFromSW.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

93.55.153.114 11:55, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

O jeugd waar zijt gij gebleven[edit]

Hi, zie -File:Bestevaerstraat1920.jpg-. Ik heb beeldbank amsterdam bericht, dat deze foto nooit uit 1920 kan komen. A. de straat heette toen nog niet zo en B. de school stond er nog niet. Die school kwam pas in 1923 (bouwopdracht) en werd in 1924 vermoedelijk slechts voor een deel geopend. Ook via Delpher blijkt dat de eerste directeur Jan Nauta pas in 1924 aangesteld werd en wel uit Friesland...... Zie ook hier. De verderop gelegen openbare Rembrandt van Rijnschool werd trouwens nog gebouwd op de hoek van de Wilhelminastraat en Jan van Galenstraat, maar is inmiddels gesloopt (snik).Ceescamel (talk) 14:15, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Willemsbrug[edit]

ARe you sure about the name of the bridge File:WillemsbrugAMS01a.jpg? According to [1]it's a different one. Regards. --Io Herodotus (talk) 10:18, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Io Herodotis! I am sure about the name, but there are two bridges in Amsterdam called Willemsbrug. This one is nr 151. See here for 151 and here for 454. Merci pour la categorisation! Milliped (talk) 17:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. The two bridges Category:Brug 454, Willemsbrug look different to me.--Io Herodotus (talk) 18:26, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Just let you know; the name Willemsbrug is withdrawn for bridge 454 starting april 2016 (probably because there was the other bridge which kept it's name). That's why www.bruggenvanamsterdam.nl doesn't mention it anymore. Peter Korrel of that site was or is working for Amsterdam All names that were not official are gone by then of changed). Bridge 454 was Willemsbrug because is was built as a connection between the Vondelpark (for the people) and Willemspark (for the rich). The Vondelpark is still there, but the Willempark is fully built now. It's remembered by the Willemsparkweg, a road named after a park that is not here anymore. Because of this, the article on the dutch wiki is renamed to Brug 454. For here, no changes are necessary. If my recollection is good there was a third Willemsbrug, which name is also withdrawn; it was near the Willemstraat, again in another part of the city.Ceescamel (talk) 16:55, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In that case Category:Brug 454, WillemsbrugCategory:Brug 454 (in Amsterdam).--Io Herodotus (talk) 01:09, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Haringpakkersbrug[edit]

Werk voor een kanoër, kajakker. Onder de brug is een kunstwerk te zien, dat alleen dus per kano of wellicht fiets gefotografeerd kan worden. Hetzelfde geldt wellicht voor de gevelsteen met een verhaal over het Amsterdams Peil (ten zuiden van de brug, langs het fietspad).Groetjes, Ceescamel (talk) 15:35, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hoi Cees! ✓ Done, vanaf het fietspad, want in een kajak zit je te laag, en is dat sowieso een heel erg druk punt voor het scheepvaartverkeer. Ik ken het vooral als de plek waar sloeppassagiers hun champagneflessen dumpen :-) Milliped (talk) 07:44, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brug 76[edit]

Frans Hendricksz. Oetgensbrug. Mocht je nog eens uit varen gaan naar de Prinsengracht, hoek Amstel. Zou je dan een detailfoto willen maken van het verschil in oud en "nieuw" metselwerk. En volgens bij heeft deze brug ook ergens een datumsteen, maar ik weet het niet zeker.Ceescamel (talk) 09:12, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Datumsteen zit denk ik aan de Amstelzijde, ik zal kijken. Dat er onderscheidelijk metselwerk te zien zou zijn verbaast me, er zijn veel bruggen in de stad waar je de uitbreiding en het oplappen door de eeuwen heen goed kan zien, maar bij deze staat me daar niets van bij. Maar ik zal er weer eens langspeddelen :-) Milliped (talk) 07:46, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ik was er ook even (au die kuiten); er zitten wel twee stenen aan de Amstelzijde, maar die zijn totaal verweerd, ik kan er niets meer op zien.Ceescamel (talk) 13:49, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Samuel de Ranitzbrug[edit]

Voor deze brug over de Singelgracht waren toch nieuwe foto's nodig, maar ik fietste er gisteren langs en er is achter de brugpijler een stroomgeleidesysteem aangebracht, typisch een werkje voor een kanoer.....Ceescamel (talk) 10:00, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ik kwam er langsgefietst, en er zit inderdaad een anlage achter, typisch, ik weet van geen andere brug in Amsterdam die zoiets heeft. Ik zal het binnenkort ook nog eens vanaf het water fotograferen. Milliped (talk) 08:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Dank voor je mooie foto's; de Ad Grimmonbrug heeft inmiddels een soortgelijk system. Ik heb de aannemer en ontwerper gebeld (moest toch wat); je kan ze vaker tegenkomen in de stad, zie het verhaal bij de Ad Grimmonbrug.Ceescamel (talk) 12:13, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NDSM-werf?[edit]

Beste Milliped,

De donor van de luchtfoto's van NIMH, waar jij ook aan werkte (dank!, o.a. NDSM-werf), meelde me vandaag dat het om Rotterdam gaat! Ik zit te turen naar foto's van de NDSM, maar herken hem niet. Jij wel? Zo niet, weet je misschien welke haven het in Rotterdam zou kunnen zijn? Groeten, Hansmuller (talk) 19:13, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ik was dan knap abuis. Het Prins Hendrikdok №1 hoorde niet bij de NDSM, maar bij de RDM (zie hier). Ik zou dan verwachten dat de plaat ook in de omgeving van de RDM op de Heyplaat genomen is. Ik meen me te herinneren dat er op Commons meer luchtfoto's (andere bron dan NIMH) van de haven van Rotterdam voor de oorlog te vinden zijn, daar kan het misschien geverifieerd worden. De havenvorm doet sterk het vermoeden rijzen dat dit de Heyplaat is. (Ik zou het misschien een Rotterdammer vragen, ik ben de foto's van Amsterdam afgegaan, daar ben ik wat meer thuis :-) Milliped (talk) 19:42, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ping collega User:Stunteltje trouwens, kan jij dit thuisbrengen? Milliped (talk) 19:46, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Eerlijk gezegd: neen. En ik kan me uiteraard nog goed herinneren dat er dokken lagen in de dokhaven, maar daarmee was dat de dokhaven op Charlois en niet zozeer bij droogdok zelf. De overzichtsfoto kan ik niet thuisbrengen, want de afbouwkraan (die hele lange) herken ik niet. Daar stond ik zelf op toen bij droogdok de Rotterdam te water ging en die kwam er naast te liggen. (Met een buurman die mij herkende en dat verklapte aan mijn ouders.) --Stunteltje (talk) 06:04, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nieuwe Amstelbrug[edit]

Mocht je er weer eens op uit trekken in de kajak, zou je dan willen zien of je nieuwe foto's zou kunnen maken van de Nieuwe Amstelbrug met dan detailfoto's van de plaquettes: 1. Het wapen van Amsterdam, 2. een Koggeschip, 3. Anno en 4. 1902; ze zouden ingemetseld moeten zijn op de pijlers langs de middendoorvaart. Als het lukt, op de zuidwestelijke walkant staat nog een brugwachtershuisje in de Amsterdamse Schoolstijl.Ceescamel (talk) 11:21, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eindelijk geüpload! Milliped (talk) 23:48, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brug 285[edit]

Hello Milliped. I have a doubt about file:Iglesia Sint Nicolaaskerk - panoramio.jpg. Is it really brug 285 ? It looks different from your picture. --Io Herodotus (talk) 03:26, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Io Herodotus, t'as raison. Le pont dans l'image est brug 326, le Nieuwe Nieuwebrug (maintenant detruit pour la plupart). J'ai modifié la catégorie. Milliped (talk) 09:27, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merci beaucoup, je comprends mieux. Il me semblait bien qu'un pont avait été détruit. --Io Herodotus (talk) 12:58, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Marker Wadden[edit]

Bonjour Milliped. Je pensais que les îles de Marker Wadden allaient être construites près de la Houtribdijk. D'après les photos, ce n'est pas le cas, c'est beaucoup plus proche d'Amsterdam. Donc la carte File:Marker wadden.jpg est fausse. --Io Herodotus (talk) 10:46, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

JanVanZutphenplantsoenVanafdeSlotervaart.jpg[edit]

Zie deze foto JanVanZutphenplantsoenVanafdeSlotervaart.jpg. Dit is niet het Zutphenplantsoen, want dat begint juist achter de brug. Toch bedankt, want het laat wel de uitgang van duiker 769 zien. Ik heb om vernoeming gevraagd, Ceescamel (talk) 09:48, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Multichillcoord1.JPG[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Multichillcoord1.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 20:53, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's a screenshot from a Wikimedia tool (which I think has disappeared in the mean time as well. Forgot why I needed that, but it is no longer required. Delete it if you want. Milliped (talk) 20:57, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Metroplattegrond Amsterdam[edit]

Ha Milliped, stuur me even je mailadres via het contactformulier op railsinamsterdam.wordpress.com, dan kan ik het bestand met je delen. Alargule (talk) 15:29, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Klein wereldje is het toch. Milliped (talk) 21:15, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Paris[edit]

Thank you for the work done at Paris yesterday. Jérémy-Günther-Heinz Jähnick (talk) 12:51, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Túrelio (talk) 20:49, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

العربيَّة  Deutsch  español  English  français  português  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hi Milliped, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.
rubin16 (talk) 05:45, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Ferries of the Netherlands has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


JopkeB (talk) 05:30, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]