User talk:Bedivere
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 23:07, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Why did you delete the page File:SML Movie- Cody Goes To Kindergarten! Part 2.webm
When I thought the copyright holder allows anybody to use it. Hjajajsbbxb12 (talk) 02:15, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- I found no evidence of the video being released under a CC license, on the website, so I deleted it as a copyright violation. Bedivere (talk) 02:54, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Thank you
Hello, thank you for understand and approving my unblock request. Have a good day :) Antny08 (talk) 14:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
2806:105E:F:0:0:0:0:0/48
Hola Bedivere, estaba viendo que Marrovi mantiene un amplio rango IP manejando a sus anchas, si revisas las contribuciones incluyen ediciones a su categoría de fotografías, lo que implica que poco o nada está afectando el bloqueo. En la Wikipedia en español sí mantiene el bloqueo en el rango. Saludos. Taichi (talk) 23:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hola @Taichi: He aplicado un bloqueo al rango de IP de Marrovi. Muchas gracias por reportarlo! Bedivere (talk) 23:48, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Favour to ask
Hi. I have some concern about Special:Contributions/Jorge_Arboleda and what seems to be a personal photo collection here. Jmabel mirrored some of my concerns (conversation User talk:Jmabel#2nd_opinion). Wondered whether you could have a look and have a conversation to point them in the right direction. Thanks if you can, otherwise I will try an English language conversation. — billinghurst sDrewth 21:45, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Billinghurst Hi there! I'm not sure it will make much of a difference since the user has not been active for nearly two years, but I will leave them a message. I personally think some images are salvageable but some definitely aren't. Let's hope for a response :-) Bedivere (talk) 03:46, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
My AN/U "issue"
Dear Bedivere, unfortunately I was unable to contribute to the discussion that took place about me due to other activities in real life. We are all volunteers here who want to support this project in our valuable free time :-) I would have liked to have written a few lines to justify myself on this. On a positive note, I have noticed your balanced and neutral assessment of this matter, for which you deserve my appreciation. Best regards, Msb (talk) 18:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- hi @Mosbatho I didn't see your message earlier. Thanks for your message and stay away from trouble! Have a great day. Bedivere (talk) 00:13, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Violaciones de copyright
Buenos días, te escribo porque me di cuenta de que borraste un archivo que subí, y a continuación varios otros más. El primero de ellos, una imagen del escudo de Palmilla, se encontraba con la licencia correcta, pues solicité a través de las plataformas de transparencia del gobierno de Chile, y en concreto de la Municipalidad de Palmilla, cuál era la licencia que utilizaba la página web de esta última. La respuesta que me llegó el día de hoy me señala que se trata de una "licencia de software libre estándar W3C Software Notice and Licence", que es la que señalé en el archivo que subí (Template:W3C Licence). Entiendo que usted desconocía esa información, pero por lo menos me pudo haber señalado mi error en mi página de discusión y así yo le hubiera aclarado la situación.
Respecto del resto de los archivos que borró, asumo que se trata de una situación similar (uso incorrecto de licencias). Nuevamente me hubiera gustado un aviso previo, sin embargo, comprendo que sólo aplicaba las normas sobre uso de licencias en Wikimedia. Intentaré conocer cuáles son las licencias que corresponde usar para dichas imágenes, solicitando dicha información por transparencia a los gobiernos regionales de Chile. Le recuerdo también que uno de esos archivos era un cropped de File:Ricardo Diaz foto.jpg, y no entiendo por qué borró mi recorte y no el original.
Sin más que añadir, lo mantendré al tanto sobre futuros avances respecto del copyright de dichos archivos. Saludos cordiales. SamuelInzunza (talk) 15:08, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- @SamuelInzunza
- Respecto al escudo de Palmilla, se necesitaría autorización publica o a través de correo electrónico, ver COM:VRT.
- Sobre los archivos de gobiernos regionales, estos tenían la etiqueta CC-GobCL que no correspondía, por lo tanto, fueron borrados por violación de derechos de autor Bedivere (talk) 15:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ojo que en el caso de Palmilla, es el municipio el que tendría que enviar el correo electrónico, no serviría de nada que tú lo reenviaras. Bedivere (talk) 15:11, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Lo cierto es que el sitio web de la municipalidad dice lo siguiente:
- DERECHOS DE PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL
- Los derechos de propiedad intelectual correspondientes del sitio www.munipalmilla.cl pertenecen a la Ilustre Municipalidad de Palmilla. Se prohíbe la reproducción, total o parcial, en cualquier forma o por cualquier medio del contenido de este sitio y/o página, sin autorización expresa y por escrito de su representante titular o de quien este designe para este efecto.
- Además, al pie de página indica Todos los derechos reservados.
- En consecuencia, si ello no se modifica o no existe un correo electrónico del municipio dirigido a permissions-commons, la situación no cambiará Bedivere (talk) 15:17, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ojo que en el caso de Palmilla, es el municipio el que tendría que enviar el correo electrónico, no serviría de nada que tú lo reenviaras. Bedivere (talk) 15:11, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello Bedivere, I believe commons and encyclopedia as a whole has strict rules against copyright violations and I do understand why the above mentioned file was speedied here. However, if you take a good look on the link the nominator claims the file was taken from, they do not match as on the deleted file the woman was wearing that cloth over her head and on the aforementioned link she's not. Therefore, I was requesting undeletion and requesting the nominator to be careful next time and also be aware of the dates before nominating for deletion Thank you. Dxneo (talk) 00:47, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Dxneo I am afraid I cannot accept the request for undeletion. The picture is not the own work of Benson Kaile as claimed, and it is a mugshot, very similar to those made available by the Tanzanian police. User Benson Kaile has uploaded several other copyright violations, which I am in the process of deleting. Bedivere (talk) 01:02, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Happy editing. Dxneo (talk) 01:05, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Legalizar logos
@Bedivere Buenas, una pregunta que pasaría si el CNE (poder electoral, Dominio Público) legaliza el logo de un partido político en Venezuela estará al Dominio Público ({{PD-VenezuelaGov}})?? Por que el CNE es el poder electoral que convierte Logos de partidos políticos en Venezuela en tarjetas electorales AbchyZa22 (talk) 18:33, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- No, porque no fue producido por el Estado, sino por el partido respectivo Bedivere (talk) 18:55, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Bedivere:Si, pero otra pregunta los boletines electorales (tarjeton electoral, por ejemplo File:Tarjeton Electoral.jpeg) forma parte del sector público o privado??
- (Nota:Si el boletin electoral es sector público es posible agregar el {{PD-VenezuelaGov}}) Porque dentro del tarjeton electoral están los Logos (tarjetas electorales) de partidos políticos AbchyZa22 (talk) 19:12, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Bedivere:Porque según el Usuario Ruthven "El problema principal es que incluyen datos privados (los logos de los partidos). Si quitas estos logos, el boletín está en el dominio público" AbchyZa22 (talk) 19:13, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Claro, se podrían subir los boletines pero sin los logos. Los logos no son elaborados por empleados públicos, por lo tanto no son de dominio público. Bedivere (talk) 20:52, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Bedivere:Porque según el Usuario Ruthven "El problema principal es que incluyen datos privados (los logos de los partidos). Si quitas estos logos, el boletín está en el dominio público" AbchyZa22 (talk) 19:13, 22 March 2024 (UTC)